Should India be included or why not japan , brazil and germany? Fact everyone agrees is UNSC is a reminiscent of WWII era. Things have changed. But each of the so called G4 have their strong opponents too. Since I do not know much about regional politics of the countries other than India, I m not going to comment on them. It is quite logical that India being the largest democracy with a vibrant culture and population be included. Regarding Veto, best would not to have a veto at all. But despite everything, say if India is not included in the UNSC, the loss would be for the world as a whole. If one sixth of the humanity is not adequetly represented, cant say UN represents world equally. But I am not really concerned. If pakistan in future attains a level of maturity, economic strength and influence in the world, then it is nice to have it too as a permanent member. However, whether india included or not, when it grows as predicted, it cannot be disregarded for long lest UN losing its relevance in the world.